Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Decapitation succession talk behind doors on Capitol Hill

(John, I have permission from Wayne)

Demise of Federal Government is starting and it will be quick.

The following reporting just came out on "The Wayne Madsen Report" on what is happening on the hill behind closed doors and with urgency.

April 12-13, 2011 -- Decapitation succession talk behind doors on Capitol Hill

For the first time since the weeks and months after 9/11, Congressional leaders and staff are, once again, discussing presidential line-of-succession. The focus is on the Senate President pro tem position, which, according to the Presidential Succession Act of 1947, places the Senate President third in line of succession to the President after the Vice President and Speaker of the House of Representatives. Also being discussed in the re-constitution of the U.S. Congress in the event that a major "catastrophe" wipes out a number of senators and representatives.

Increasingly, lawmakers are concerned about the fact that due to seniority, the current and last Senate Presidents pro tem have been aging octogenarians. The current president, Senator Daniel Inouye of Hawaii, is 86. Inouye replaced Senator Robert Byrd last year. Byrd was 92.

In the cases of Byrd, had the top leadership, the President, Vice President, and Speaker of the House, been lost in a major catastrophic event, the duties of the presidency would have fallen, for all practical purposes, on Byrd's senior staff. The same situation now exists with the aging Inouye.

Although Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has been reluctant to talk about proposals to change the Senate rules to ensure that someone more able-bodied and -minded is in the Senate President pro tem position, the seniority achieved by senators like Byrd and Inouye make it virtually impossible to force them to give up the prestigious position with all its perks.

Another term being used by Congressional staffers concerned about line-of-succession is "decapitation," a term not heard much since the days after 9/11. Decapitation refers to the sudden elimination of the top leadership of the U.S. government as the result of a catastrophic event, which could include a surprise nuclear attack on Washington, a major terrorist attack, or a Armageddon-level natural disaster.

It is not known what has prompted Congress's renewed interest in the line-of-succession debate.

This is evidence that there are white hat insiders that are in the know that the Fed Gov is going to be "decapitated".

They are looking at traditional catastrophes, however, this is more like someone knows that Obama is going to be exposed for being ilegit. A terrorist or nuclear attack wouldn't do nearly the decapitation job as going into a constitutional crisis because the president is null and void. This crisis would nullify the legitimacy of Biden, executive appointees, 2 Supreme Court judges, and Federal Judge appointees. This situation is fraud and treason. It is an overthrow of the government by an imposter - this act is treason. The domino effect reaches into both the Senate and Congress to anyone who participated in the cover-up - they have committed Misprision of Treason making them equally culpable.

Neither an act of terrorism, or natural disaster (e.g. Japan), can guarantee the "decapitation" of the Federal government. Deeming Obama inelligible to be president guarantees that the Fed government will be decapitated. This constitutional crisis effectively wipes out the Executive Branch, large chunks of the Legislative Branch and the Judicial Branch (Supreme Court and Federal Court). I'd say it is truly a decapitation in the truest sense. By virtue of them talking about making constitutional changes in the Line of Succession (using that lame smoke screen of the age of the President of the Senate) is a good indication that the tradtional line of succession would not be legit either or would have to go so far down that there are no longer any consitutional parameters.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Can you spell Republic for the united States?

David Mosher said...

This "constitutional crisis" should be dealt with with the imprisonment of most of the government leaders who have said nothing about the fraud.
Let's clean house and promote the Constitutional Republic that was re-inhabited in Utah in 2010.

Anonymous said...

I agree this needs to be dealt with but I want NOTHING to do with RuSA/RAP or anything associated with it! Thanks but NO THANKS! WE the people will decide how it's handled, not a religious cult.

Anonymous said...

I have precipitated the discussion with both my NYS Case naming Biden and Obama and the recusal petition against Justice Roberts et al.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/48978571/SUMMONS-and-VERIFIED-COMPLAINT-for-Strunk-v-NYS-BOE-et-al-NYS-6500-2011

and my SCOTUS Petition, in which my filing fee for the Writ at SCOTUS has been down there since Monday. I spoke with the Clerk today and she said that I am unable to submit a petition on 8.5 by 11 inch format only in booklet form that requires typesetting which would destroy my exhibits.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/52438246/CES-Petition-w-SCOTUS-Rule-20-w-Exhibits-in-re-SCOTUS-10-1170-040511


She insisted that SCOTUS would not accept a Writ of Prohibition petition from me when in 8.5 by 11 format when I have tendered a filing fee; and notwithstanding whether it is impossible to typeset exhibits or embed a reduced version into the smaller page format also would not be acceptable.

The Pope's Bishops rule there and I have to file a poor person versus the SCOTUS Clerk poor person writ of Prohibition petition to order the clerk to follow the SCOTUS written rules per se rather than their illiterate ways that are stupid and arbitrary.

For instance SCOTUS rules use "e.g." that does not mean "that is" it means "for example". I am going to get a writ to file a 8.5 by 11 inch petition for writ of prohibition.

Mr. Trump as a SMOM member has taken the low raod and is about to be ambushed because there is a good possibility the BHO was born in Seattle NOT Kenya and all that snipe hunt for finding out where waldo was born instead of the DUAL ALLEGIANCE issue that I have pursued for over two years. BHO is not Natural born with a British subject father, but he may be Native born (as he claims to be) with only one citizen parent. Lucas Smith is a CIA stringer among others.

Chris Strunk - chris@strunk.ws