Colour of Law Fraud in the Lower Courts

Colour of Law Fraud in the Lower Courts

The Lower Courts refer to all Courts where Administrative Law is practised – these include Her Majesty’s Courts, all courts of the United States, United Nations and the European Union. The colour of law fraud is exemplified by the actions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, a private corporation masquerading as a Sovereign Tax Authority. What is true of the IRS is also true of the Town Councils in the ‘United Kingdom’.

From William Thornton of 1215.org (1215 being the year the Magna Carta was signed)

Colour of Law fraud by the Internal Revenue Service, United States

Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:32 -0800
From: Bill Thornton
To: Bob Schulz
Subject: Re: The law requires citizens to pay Income Tax

Although I can show you the law, just showing you the law is not sufficient.  You must understand the system that produces that law.  Below you will find a brief outline of that system and how it leads to a law requiring one to do whatever the IRS wishes.

It's actually very simple.  The information here is described in much greater detail at http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/foundation.htm
The underlined links provide more information.

Here's the chain of logic:

In the USA there are two systems of law:  Roman Civil Law and Common Law.  Roman civil law is the law of the legislature.  Common law is the law of the people.

Attorneys are well trained in Roman civil law, but they have near-zero training in common law.  However, the common law trumps Roman civil law.  Even the Supreme Court of the USA may not second guess a decision of the common law.

A court is defined as "the person and suit of the sovereign."  That means that the plaintiff is the sovereign and owner of the court.  In any action at law, legally speaking, the plaintiff is the king and retains all powers for himself, including the power to make court judgments.  A judge of a court only has those powers which are delegated to him by the plaintiff king.

"The very meaning of 'sovereignty' is that the decree of the sovereign makes law."

A court of record is the only fully empowered [superior] court in America.  All other courts are inferior courts.

Ask any attorney and he will explain that a court of record is a court that keeps a record of the proceedings and has the power to fine or imprison for contempt.  That's only half the story.  The rest of the story is that it is a court that proceeds according to the common law (no statutes), and the tribunal (the one doing the judging) is independent of the magistrate (the judge).  Notice that in a court of record the judge is not allowed to do any judging; judging is reserved to the tribunal.  In a court of record there are only two entities that are true tribunals:  the sovereign of the court (the plaintiff), and the jury (if present).  Several times I have fined judges for contempt of court when they refused to obey the law of the court.

The IRS strategy is simple.

The IRS opens a court of record.  In the accusatory papers the sovereign accuser decrees the law:  "Defendant is required to file."  Right there, believe it or not, is the sovereign decree that creates the law in accordance with the rules of the common law.

Defendants are famous for demanding that the law be shown to them.  The "law" is contained in the accusatory papers, decreed by the sovereign plaintiff. 

The defendants do not recognize the law when they are looking straight at it.  Because defendants don't see it, their entire strategy is not relevant to the accusation.  A perfect example of this was in the Dick Simkanin case.

Defendants are correct when they claim that there is no statutory requirement to file.  But, that is not the question before the court.  The real question is, "Did you, or did you not, file your papers as required by the common law decree of the sovereign plaintiff in this court of record?"

The defending strategy is equally simple.

The proper tactic is to do a counterclaim which challenges jurisdiction.  Just as in football, the best defence is a good offence.  It is in the counterclaim that the legitimacy of the plaintiff's sovereignty may and should be challenged, because no government entity in the USA has sovereignty.  The defendant becomes the sovereign counter-plaintiff, and the plaintiff becomes the questionable counter-defendant.  Because no sovereign can legislate against any other sovereign, it follows that the counter-defendant has no legitimate authority to decree any law applicable to the counter-plaintiff.

That is a broad-brush explanation.  There is a lot more detail involved which I will be happy to give you, if you are interested.  At the web site there are three 8-hour lectures that go into great detail.  The most relevant one is at http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/lectures/sovereignty/index.html

Perhaps we could talk on the phone.  If we do, I suggest that you record the conversation for your future reference.  The best times for me are after 7PM PST, Monday thru Friday, and any time Saturday & Sunday.  During those times I can call you back at no cost to either one of us.

Bill Thornton

The Julian Assange case

The Julian Assange case features a number of notable features. The Rule of Law is signified by the flag of the formal Caesar where Julian has taken refuge – the Eagle.

The hidden Dark Lords of Finance who wanted to kidnap him have been thwarted. This Court of Record had a small but perhaps not insignificant role to play:

An anonymous member of Julian Assange’s legal team contacted one of the members of our Court on Friday the 2nd of December 2011 via an Off The Record encrypted channel. He or she is convinced on that day that there is no hope for Julian Assange at the hearing on the following Monday, especially concerning the Attorney-General of the United Kingdom who was expected to sign the deportation authorization.

Our letter of 29^th November 2011 to the Mr. Dominic Grieve, Esq, QC, MP, Attorney General's Office and the accompanying attachments are now published¹¹⁹ on the web.

The Attorney-General failed to sign the extradition papers at the trial at Her Majesty’s Courts and the ‘authorities’ have been unable to arrest him to date. Julian Assange has appeared on several TV shows on Russia Today.

Truth alters men even as heat cooks eggs. The transformation is one way.

Transmutation of Caesar into Saint Peter

Too long have we lived where Saint Paul
Prospers by the secret Power of Saint Peter
Where Captive in his Own Castle
Saint Peter’s Power goes forth as Caesar

We light Bagehot’s fire¹²⁰ of transmutation
of Caesar into Saint Peter
A match that shall become the fire that shall
consume the forest of Caesar’s statutes
And restore a Christian Kingdom
in our green and pleasant land

A mosquito does not fear man’s nets
Charlotte the living Spider would be better¹²¹ than a net
for She is alive and intelligent
and She weaves her net better

The infestation of parasites clogs blood stasis
each creature there must die:
There is the Vampire of the Internal Revenue Service
the Mosquito of Monsanto
the Mite of various copyright creatures
that lay their eggs under your skin
and the fungi that are countless Caesar’s minions
who cause the wound to fester

And the ‘parasites’ once their dead identities die
Shall see themselves as Children of Our Lord
The Children of Our Lord are to be set free
from the bonds that shackle them
The dead identities to be consumed
in the forest fire of Caesar’s Statutes

A debt jubilee shall be declared
no rent or mortgage to pay
The righteous are to get their money
as the energy which is life power
They shall travel without passport
They shall trade without a licence
They shall sing and multiply the ideas
of food, fresh, raw, from Mother nature
and music and wisdom for the soul
They shall trade these with each other
by Saint Peter’s Church marketplace

And soon their pockets shall have
the substance of God
The Freedom of the City – restored

The Church shall be universal
and people free to worship in any form

Our Lord and Master One Christ, Our Father in Heaven is the protector
of all men and women, big and small

An handy imperative check-list for Charlotte the Spider follows

in case she is “100% 18th Century”

http://www.courtofrecord.org.uk/#__RefHeading__3304_634303336